← Back to Events
COMPLETEDTier 2tsmc-monthly
TSMC June 2026 Monthly Revenue
2026-07-10 → 2026-07-10·1 companies·0 predictions
?NVDAsupply-chain
All Scenarios
2Positioning Suggestions
→ Read as a coincident AI-demand check for the semis complex
Key Questions
- MoM and YoY growth vs the prior month?
- Any HPC/AI mix commentary?
Monitoring Checklist
0/2 checked
Post-Event Results
Brier Score—
correct0/0
Trade Actions3
Actual Outcomes
- • TSMC June 2026 net revenue NT$442.68B (~US$14.6B): +6.2% MoM vs May 2026, +67.9% YoY vs June 2025. Released July 13, 2026 (3 trading days after the pre-analysis' expected July 10 window).
- • H1 2026 (Jan-Jun) revenue NT$2,404.48B, +35.6% YoY; Q2 2026 quarterly sales +36% YoY, ahead of the company's own guidance.
- • Growth was AI/HPC-foundry-led: advanced-node and AI-accelerator wafer demand stayed strong. In the same session, memory names diverged sharply lower (SK Hynix -13%) on oversupply/profit-taking, while AI-serving foundries held up — a clean intra-complex divergence.
- • Scenario resolution: the actual print landed squarely in the bullish 'strong AI/HPC-driven growth' regime (Scenario 0), decisively NOT the 'flat-to-down, mix-driven softness' regime (Scenario 1). Nuance: Scenario 0's literal 'double-digit MoM' magnitude was overstated — MoM was single-digit +6.2% — but YoY (+67.9%) and H1 (+35.6%) confirmed the AI-accelerator pull-through mechanism unambiguously.
- • NVDA price reaction decoupled from the supportive foundry print: NVDA closed DOWN on July 13 (~-2.0% to $206.77 per Yahoo/24-7 Wall St; a divergent -3.39% intraday figure was reported by TradingKey). The decline was attributed to rising Treasury yields / semiconductor multiple compression, custom-silicon competitive concerns, ETF rebalancing and profit-taking — i.e., macro/positioning, NOT the TSMC data.
- • Predictions map to the pre-analysis scenarioMatrix indices (0 = strong AI/HPC growth, 1 = flat-to-down softness); this event carried no discrete `predictions` array.
Market Reaction
NVDA2026-07-13-2.0%
Trade Recommendations
→ Coincident AI-demand check PASSED: the pre-event positioning ('read as a coincident AI-demand check for the semis complex') is validated — AI-accelerator wafer pull-through confirmed. No conditional trade was pre-specified, so none is triggered.
→ No NVDA thesis re-rate: the TSMC print is confirmatory of the AI-demand mechanism and does not overturn or materially change the NVDA thesis; the same-day NVDA weakness was macro/positioning-driven, not a fundamental signal. Route to monitoring, not a thesis-update cascade.
→ Watch the intra-complex divergence (foundry strong vs memory weak, SK Hynix -13%) as a pairs/rotation signal rather than a broad-semis derisking cue.